Software Delivery, Testing, and DevOps AI
85TriVista score
Mend AI
A security tool that inventories every AI model, prompt, and dataset a company uses and flags risky or unapproved ones.
Atlassian Rovo Dev
AI tool profile ·
An AI coding agent built into Jira and Bitbucket that plans, writes, and reviews code using ticket and repository context.
85TriVista score
Category rank#2 in Software Delivery, Testing, and DevOps AI
Baseline ELO1,562.3
Menu
At a glance
What it does
Rovo Dev is an AI coding agent built into the Jira and Bitbucket ecosystem. Developers use it through a command-line interface or an editor extension to generate code from a Jira ticket, refactor existing code, write tests and documentation, and get a first-pass review of pull requests against a ticket's acceptance criteria. It is made by Atlassian and runs on third-party models from OpenAI and Anthropic under a zero-data-retention agreement, respecting each user's existing platform permissions. It holds SOC 1, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 certifications, but Atlassian says it is not yet HIPAA-compliant or built for data-residency requirements, which matters for regulated teams.
Where it can help
This fits a team already using Jira and Bitbucket or GitHub, since it reads ticket context and repository code without much extra setup. Rovo Dev Standard is rolling out with monthly credit allowances on Jira Cloud Standard, Premium, and Enterprise plans, so a company on one of those tiers can pilot it with a single engineering team at no license cost beyond usage credits. Atlassian frames it as human-in-the-loop, meaning a person still approves every suggested review comment or code change, which limits risk but also limits time savings if adoption stays shallow. Before a wider rollout, check current credit limits and confirm that HIPAA or data-residency needs are not a blocker for regulated workloads.
Company fitHow your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Company fit
How your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Technology Maturity High Modeled score87.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,574.5 Change from baseline +22.7 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score80.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,532.5 Change from baseline -19.3 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score85.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,565.7 Change from baseline +13.9 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score85.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,565.5 Change from baseline +13.7 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score85.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,565.4 Change from baseline +13.6 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score85.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,564.6 Change from baseline +12.8 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score85.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,560.9 Change from baseline +9.1 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score85.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,560.2 Change from baseline +8.4 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score84.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,556.5 Change from baseline +4.7 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score82.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,547.2 Change from baseline -4.6 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score83.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,548.6 Change from baseline -3.2 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score84.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,554.7 Change from baseline +2.9 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score84.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,553.9 Change from baseline +2.1 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score83.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,553.3 Change from baseline +1.5 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score83.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,553.1 Change from baseline +1.3 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score83.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Manufacturing Adjusted ELO 1,553.0 Change from baseline +1.2 ELO
Cost guide
What it can cost
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $54.4K | $85.5K | $137.2K |
| Three-year total | $118.1K | $177.9K | $274.3K |
| First-year cost per unit | $54.4K | $85.5K | $137.2K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $39.4K | $59.3K | $91.4K |
Cost breakdown by scenario
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $18K | $24K | $32.4K |
| Implementation | $8.4K | $14K | $23.8K |
| Integration | $9.9K | $18K | $32.4K |
| Staff time and change management | $6K | $8.5K | $11.9K |
| Security | $4.6K | $6.5K | $9.8K |
| Administration | $3.4K | $4.5K | $6.1K |
| Support | $1.7K | $2.2K | $3K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Get started
What you need first
What you need firstSet up the basics
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
How to startSet clear limits
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Before you scaleSet safe working rules
Recommended next action
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner
Define what success looks like for a test of Atlassian Rovo Dev and assign someone to lead it.
FIRST MONTHTest one workflow
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
MONTH TWOReview actual use
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
MONTH THREEDecide what comes next
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Risk profile
Required controls
Security and safe use
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Exit and rollback
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Recommended next step
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Other tools to review
Compare similar tools
Software Delivery, Testing, and DevOps AI
74TriVista score
Harness AI
A software delivery platform that bundles AI agents for coding, security testing, deployment risk, and cloud cost into one DevOps system.
Software Delivery, Testing, and DevOps AI
74TriVista score
GitLab Duo
An AI assistant built into the GitLab software platform that suggests code, answers questions about a repository, and summarizes changes.
Software Delivery, Testing, and DevOps AI
73TriVista score
Snyk DeepCode AI
The AI engine behind Snyk's code scanner, which finds security flaws as code is written and proposes fixes with about 85% accuracy.
Research support
How to learn more about this tool
Where to check the product, price, security, and support.
Reference source Product website View source →
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Score history
How the rating has changed
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
- TriVista Score 85.4/100Category rank #2
- TriVista Score 85.4/100Category rank #2
See how this tool fits your company
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →