Creative, Video, Audio, and Generative Media
76TriVista score
Kuaishou
Kling AI
A video and image generation tool from Kuaishou, the Chinese short-video company, with a native 4K video model.
Google Veo
AI tool profile ·
Google's AI video generation model, reached through the Gemini app, the Flow creative tool, or a developer API.
75TriVista score
Category rank#4 in Creative, Video, Audio, and Generative Media
Baseline ELO1,501.3
Menu
At a glance
What it does
Veo is Google's AI video generation model. A user gives it a text prompt, or a starting image, and it creates a short video clip. Consumers reach Veo through the Gemini app or Google's Flow creative tool, and developers can call it directly through the Gemini API or Google Cloud's Vertex AI. Google AI Pro, at $19.99 a month, includes access to a faster, lighter Veo model; Google AI Ultra, at $249.99 a month, unlocks the full Veo model. The developer API bills per second of video, with rates from about $0.03 to $0.40 depending on resolution and audio. Enterprise access runs through Google Cloud's Gemini platform, which fits companies already using Google Workspace or Cloud.
Where it can help
This fits a company already using Google Workspace or Google Cloud, since it adds video generation inside tools that company already pays for. A low-cost way to try it is a Google AI Pro seat at $19.99 a month for one person, which gives access to the faster Veo model through Gemini and Flow; move to Google AI Ultra, at $249.99 a month, once someone needs the full-quality model. Developers building a custom app should test the pay-per-second API instead and budget based on expected video length and resolution. Treat all these prices as planning figures and confirm current rates with Google. For company-wide rollout, work with your Google Cloud account team on the Enterprise platform, where pricing and terms differ from the consumer subscriptions.
Company fitHow your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Company fit
How your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score75.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,503.1
Change from baseline +2.3 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score75.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.8
Change from baseline +2.1 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,498.7
Change from baseline -2.0 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,498.8
Change from baseline -2.0 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score74.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,499.1
Change from baseline -1.6 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score74.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,499.2
Change from baseline -1.5 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score74.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,499.4
Change from baseline -1.4 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Manufacturing
Adjusted ELO 1,501.9
Change from baseline +1.2 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.5
Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.5
Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Technology Maturity High Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,501.5
Change from baseline +0.7 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score75.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,500.2
Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,501.0
Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,501.0
Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,500.7
Change from baseline -0.0 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,500.7
Change from baseline -0.0 ELO
Cost guide
What it can cost
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $24.2K | $39.8K | $66.7K |
| Three-year total | $42.9K | $68.1K | $110.8K |
| First-year cost per unit | $1.2K | $2K | $3.3K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $715 | $1.1K | $1.8K |
Cost breakdown by scenario
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $900 | $1.2K | $1.6K |
| Implementation | $7.2K | $12K | $20.4K |
| Integration | $5K | $9K | $16.2K |
| Staff time and change management | $3.9K | $5.5K | $7.7K |
| Security | $2.8K | $4K | $6K |
| Administration | $2.3K | $3K | $4.1K |
| Support | $1.1K | $1.5K | $2K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 20 enabled creators. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Get started
What you need first
What you need firstSet up the basics
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
How to startSet clear limits
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Before you scaleSet safe working rules
Recommended next action
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner
Define what success looks like for a test of Google Veo and assign someone to lead it.
FIRST MONTHTest one workflow
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
MONTH TWOReview actual use
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
MONTH THREEDecide what comes next
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Risk profile
Required controls
Security and safe use
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Exit and rollback
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Recommended next step
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Other tools to review
Compare similar tools
Creative, Video, Audio, and Generative Media
76TriVista score
Kaiber
A video generation tool that now works mainly as a single subscription giving access to several outside AI video models.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with KaiberCreative, Video, Audio, and Generative Media
75TriVista score
Luma AI
Luma Ray (formerly Dream Machine)
An AI video generation tool from Luma AI, known for realistic motion and camera moves, formerly sold under the Dream Machine name.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Luma Ray (formerly Dream Machine)Creative, Video, Audio, and Generative Media
75TriVista score
Pika
A text- and image-to-video tool best known for playful effects like swapping objects in a scene or twisting it in odd ways.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with PikaResearch support
How to learn more about this tool
Where to check the product, price, security, and support.
Official product information
deepmind.google/models/veo
Read official information →
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Score history
How the rating has changed
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
-
TriVista Score 75.2/100Category rank #4
-
TriVista Score 75.2/100Category rank #4
See how this tool fits your company
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →