Activepieces

AI tool profile ·

An open-source automation tool that connects more than 760 apps and can run on a company's own servers for free.

68TriVista score
Category rankTied #10 in Workflow Automation and RPA
Baseline ELO1,459.8
At a glance
What it does

Activepieces is an open-source automation tool where users build flows on a visual canvas without writing code. Flows can include AI agents that complete a multi-step task, with a human check step to approve the result. It connects to more than 760 apps, including Slack, HubSpot, and Stripe, and works with several AI providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini. A built-in MCP server lets tools like Claude or Cursor run flows you already built. Its MIT-licensed core means a company can self-host it for free, or it runs as a paid cloud service. Admins get single sign-on through Okta or Entra, audit logs, and role-based access, and it can deploy in the cloud, on your own servers, or fully air-gapped.

Where it can help

This fits a team that wants an open-source automation option with the ability to self-host for data control. A reasonable starting point is the free cloud plan, with 100 credits a day and unlimited flows. The Plus plan costs $20 a month as a planning figure for 10,000 credits and up to five users, and the Team plan runs $200 a month for 25 users and adds single sign-on. Self-hosting the open-source core carries no license fee but needs your own server and IT time to maintain, so a technical team should evaluate it closely first. Two risks are worth weighing: it has fewer integrations than Zapier, at just over 760, and credit usage can be hard to predict once several AI steps run inside a single flow.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
68.3
Category rank
#10
Baseline ELO
1,459.8

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Workflow Automation and RPA. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The tool has a middle-of-the-scale starting rating. A tied order does not show a measured difference.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production deployment.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$49.3K$78.3K$127.1K
Three-year total$103.5K$157.5K$245.6K
First-year cost per unit$49.3K$78.3K$127.1K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$34.5K$52.5K$81.9K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$13.5K$18K$24.3K
Implementation$8.4K$14K$23.8K
Integration$9.9K$18K$32.4K
Staff time and change management$5.6K$8K$11.2K
Security$4.6K$6.5K$9.8K
Administration$3.4K$4.5K$6.1K
Support$1.7K$2.2K$3K

Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Activepieces and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Workflow Automation and RPA
87TriVista score

Tines

A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Tines
Workflow Automation and RPA
86TriVista score

Gumloop

A no-code tool where a team builds AI agents together on a shared canvas, connecting them to apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Gmail.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Gumloop
Workflow Automation and RPA
76TriVista score

Bardeen

A browser extension that pulls data from websites and finds sales leads, rather than automating back-office processes.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Bardeen

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with AutomationEdge
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information activepieces.com Read official information →
Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 68.3/100
    Category rank #10

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →