Find company knowledge
Find answers across your documents and internal resources.
A machine health service that clips wireless sensors onto factory equipment to catch failures early, with human analysts checking the AI's alerts.
Augury is a machine health monitoring service for factories. It sells wireless sensors that clip onto pumps, motors, and other rotating equipment and track vibration, temperature, and magnetic signals around the clock. Augury's AI flags early signs of wear or failure, and a team of certified vibration analysts reviews many alerts before they reach the customer, which cuts false alarms compared to simple threshold alarms. The system connects to common maintenance software, including SAP PM, IBM Maximo, and Infor EAM. Augury holds ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certifications. Customers span food and beverage, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, mining, and oil and gas, and most sites see results on their first monitored machine within about a month.
This fits a plant with a lot of rotating equipment, such as pumps, motors, fans, and compressors, and a reliability or maintenance team that wants fewer surprise breakdowns. A common starting point is one production line or one set of critical machines; sensor hardware ships with the subscription, and setup on a first machine often takes about a month. Public pricing is not listed; third-party estimates put costs around $50 to $200 per machine per month, so confirm real numbers with Augury directly and budget separately for sensor batteries, which need replacing every three to five years. The tool works best on rotating equipment monitored by vibration and is a weaker fit for failure types that vibration sensors do not catch well. Expect an ongoing subscription cost per machine, not a one-time purchase.
Potential matches to review against your requirements. Explore matching tools or read a task guide before you choose.
Find answers across your documents and internal resources.
Bring key business metrics together in dashboards and summaries for leadership.
Plan production around orders, available capacity, materials, and delivery deadlines.
Identify bottlenecks and support frontline teams with clearer work instructions and operational insights.
Use equipment data to spot potential issues and plan maintenance before breakdowns.
The industries and leadership roles this tool is most often matched with.
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Three-year total | $226.3K | $339.9K | $522.5K |
| First-year cost per unit | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $75.5K | $113.3K | $174.2K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $37.5K | $50K | $67.5K |
| Implementation | $16.8K | $28K | $47.6K |
| Integration | $17.6K | $32K | $57.6K |
| Staff time and change management | $10.5K | $15K | $21K |
| Security | $7.7K | $11K | $16.5K |
| Administration | $5.6K | $7.5K | $10.1K |
| Support | $2.6K | $3.5K | $4.7K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Augury and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Export edge deployment settings and safe-state and override configuration, plus raw sensor history, derived features, asset hierarchy, alerts, diagnoses, work-order links, operator feedback, model versions, thresholds, and edge configuration from Augury Machine Health. Keep authoritative source records in CMMS. Site hardware, trained asset models, and OT integrations create high switching cost; keep machine history in usable time-series formats and overlap vendors long enough to validate safety and detection performance.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.
Why it’s an alternativeStronger for medium and large fleets or asset operators with meaningful failure cost, connected equipment, and a maintenance organization capable of acting before breakdown.
Compare with UptakeA no-code computer vision tool that lets quality teams build models to spot visual defects without writing code or hiring data scientists.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Landing AIA predictive maintenance tool that forecasts equipment failures from sensor and maintenance data and adds a chat assistant for engineers.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with C3 AI ReliabilityRoyal HaskoningDHV (Lanner)
Simulation software for modeling factories and supply chains before making real changes, now sold by Haskoning under its Twinn brand rather than by Lanner.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Lanner WITNESSWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →