Uptake

AI tool profile ·

Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.

87TriVista score
Category rank#1 in Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
Baseline ELO1,569.1
At a glance
What it does

Uptake is predictive maintenance software for vehicle and equipment fleets. It was founded as a broader industrial AI company, but its main product today focuses on trucks, buses, and heavy equipment. Fleet managers use it to spot problems before a vehicle breaks down on the road. The Risk Explorer feature ranks issues by how serious they are, and remote diagnostics let a team check a vehicle's health without a physical inspection. Uptake connects to telematics systems like Platform Science, Trimble, CalAmp, and Intellishift, holds SOC 2 certification, and has built a large library of known failure patterns from years of fleet data. Bosch announced plans to acquire Uptake in March 2026.

Where it can help

This fits a company running fleets of trucks, buses, or heavy construction equipment, and a fleet or maintenance team that wants fewer roadside breakdowns. A good starting point is one class of vehicle, like a truck fleet, before adding others. Uptake does not publish pricing; ask for a quote and treat any number as a planning estimate. Note that Bosch is in the process of acquiring Uptake, which could change pricing, product direction, or support over the next year or two, so ask both companies about the roadmap before you sign a long contract. The tool works best for teams that already use telematics systems like Trimble or Platform Science, since Uptake plugs into that existing data instead of replacing it.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
86.5
Category rank
#1
Baseline ELO
1,569.1

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The starting rating includes a product-specific comparison.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Business Goals

Business goals to explore

Potential matches to review against your requirements. Explore matching tools or read a task guide before you choose.

Company fit

Where this tool fits best

The industries and leadership roles this tool is most often matched with.

How your company could affect the fit

How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.

Technology Maturity High Modeled score88.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,580.8 Change from baseline +27.0 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score87.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,573.2 Change from baseline +19.4 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score86.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,571.2 Change from baseline +17.4 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score86.6 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,569.3 Change from baseline +15.5 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score86.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,567.6 Change from baseline +13.8 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score85.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,565.3 Change from baseline +11.5 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score85.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,562.7 Change from baseline +8.9 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score82.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,546.9 Change from baseline -6.9 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score83.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,548.9 Change from baseline -4.9 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score83.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,550.4 Change from baseline -3.4 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score83.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,551.2 Change from baseline -2.6 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score83.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#2
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,551.2 Change from baseline -2.6 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score83.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,552.9 Change from baseline -0.9 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score83.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline Manufacturing Adjusted ELO 1,553.0 Change from baseline -0.8 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score84.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,554.7 Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score84.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#1
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,554.0 Change from baseline +0.1 ELO
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production deployment.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$103.3K$161.7K$258.8K
Three-year total$226.3K$339.9K$522.5K
First-year cost per unit$103.3K$161.7K$258.8K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$75.5K$113.3K$174.2K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$37.5K$50K$67.5K
Implementation$16.8K$28K$47.6K
Integration$17.6K$32K$57.6K
Staff time and change management$10.5K$15K$21K
Security$7.7K$11K$16.5K
Administration$5.6K$7.5K$10.1K
Support$2.6K$3.5K$4.7K

Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Uptake and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Export edge deployment settings and safe-state and override configuration, plus raw sensor history, derived features, asset hierarchy, alerts, diagnoses, work-order links, operator feedback, model versions, thresholds, and edge configuration from Uptake. Site hardware, trained asset models, and OT integrations create high switching cost; keep machine history in usable time-series formats and overlap vendors long enough to validate safety and detection performance. The catalog status is “Active | Bosch acquisition announced and pending as of July 27, 2026”; confirm renewal, support, successor-product, and migration rights before further commitment.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
86TriVista score

Landing AI

A no-code computer vision tool that lets quality teams build models to spot visual defects without writing code or hiring data scientists.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Landing AI
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score

C3 AI Reliability

A predictive maintenance tool that forecasts equipment failures from sensor and maintenance data and adds a chat assistant for engineers.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with C3 AI Reliability
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score

Royal HaskoningDHV (Lanner)

Lanner WITNESS

Simulation software for modeling factories and supply chains before making real changes, now sold by Haskoning under its Twinn brand rather than by Lanner.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Lanner WITNESS
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score

Protex AI

A workplace safety tool that reads existing security cameras with computer vision to catch risks like missing PPE or unsafe forklift driving.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Protex AI
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information uptake.com Read official information →

Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Good support.

Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 86.5/100
    Category rank #1
  • Research release
    TriVista Score 86.5/100
    Category rank #1

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →