Contact Us

SEARCH

Comet

AI tool profile ·

A tool for tracking machine learning experiments and for testing, monitoring, and debugging AI apps, with prices published online.

Compare tools
74TriVista score
Category rank#9 in Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Baseline ELO1,494.1
AI Labs by TriVista
Menu
Browse AI tools All AI tools Compare tools side by side Tools by Business Goal AI use cases Guides by role Guides by industry
About the research How the ratings work Latest research FAQ About AI Labs
Summary Company fit Cost Setup Risk Alternatives Research support Compare
At a glance
What it does

Comet is an AI development platform covering two connected areas. Its MLOps side handles experiment tracking, model versioning, and dataset management for teams building traditional machine learning models. Its Opik product, which has an open-source version, adds tracing, testing, and monitoring for generative AI applications and agents, with more than 60 integrations, over 40 automated evaluation metrics for checking output quality, and a built-in assistant called Ollie that flags recurring errors and suggests fixes. It is made by Comet ML and can run as a fully managed cloud service or be self-hosted. The company states SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA-related compliance and publishes pricing online: Pro plans start at $19 per user per month, with a free tier for small teams.

Where it can help

This fits a team that wants to see real prices before a sales call, since both its MLOps and Opik products list plan costs on the website. A good starting point is the free tier, which covers a small team and enough usage to test experiment tracking or generative AI monitoring on one real project. Paid Pro plans start at $19 per user per month with defined usage limits, and larger deployments move to custom enterprise pricing with single sign-on and added compliance support; treat these as planning estimates. The main risk is underestimating usage growth once monitoring is added to more applications, since usage-based limits like training hours or trace volume can push a growing team into a higher tier faster than expected.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
74.0
Category rank
#9
Baseline ELO
1,494.1

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The starting rating includes a product-specific comparison.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Company fit

How your company could affect the fit

How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,494.7 Change from baseline +2.0 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,494.6 Change from baseline +1.9 ELO
Technology Maturity High Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,494.4 Change from baseline +1.7 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score73.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,491.2 Change from baseline -1.5 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score74.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,494.1 Change from baseline +1.4 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score74.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.9 Change from baseline +1.2 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score73.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.7 Change from baseline +1.0 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score73.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,491.9 Change from baseline -0.8 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score73.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.4 Change from baseline +0.7 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score73.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,493.4 Change from baseline +0.7 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score73.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.3 Change from baseline +0.6 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score73.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.2 Change from baseline +0.5 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score73.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,492.2 Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score73.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.1 Change from baseline +0.4 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score73.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline Manufacturing Adjusted ELO 1,492.3 Change from baseline -0.4 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score73.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,493.0 Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production workspace.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$81.3K$128.2K$206.5K
Three-year total$175.2K$264.6K$409.1K
First-year cost per unit$81.3K$128.2K$206.5K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$58.4K$88.2K$136.4K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$27K$36K$48.6K
Implementation$13.2K$22K$37.4K
Integration$15.4K$28K$50.4K
Staff time and change management$8.4K$12K$16.8K
Security$6.3K$9K$13.5K
Administration$4.9K$6.5K$8.8K
Support$2.3K$3K$4.1K

Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production workspace. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Comet and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Google Vertex AI

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Databricks Mosaic AI
Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
83TriVista score

SAS Viya

A cloud analytics and AI platform combining statistics, machine learning, and an AI copilot, from the long-established statistics software maker SAS.

View profile →

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with SAS Viya

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with IBM watsonx.ai
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information comet.com Read official information →

Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.

Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 74.0/100
    Category rank #9
  • Research release
    TriVista Score 74.0/100
    Category rank #9

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →