Elementum

AI tool profile ·

A supply chain control tower tool for spotting disruptions, from a company that o9 Solutions bought in 2024 and no longer sold on its own.

68TriVista score
Category rankTied #11 in Supply Chain, Planning, and Logistics AI
Baseline ELO1,459.8
At a glance
What it does

Elementum was a supply chain control tower, a tool for spotting and fixing disruptions in real time. Teams pulled data from suppliers, logistics partners, and internal systems into one shared view; it flagged risks, like weather delays or part shortages, then routed each issue to the right person. Elementum started inside contract manufacturer Flextronics and became independent in 2014. In January 2024, planning software company o9 Solutions bought Elementum and folded its tools into the o9 Digital Brain platform, so Elementum is not sold as a stand-alone product today. A separate, unrelated company also uses the Elementum name now for a different AI tool. Confirm current availability directly with o9 Solutions before you evaluate this listing.

Where it can help

This entry needs a caveat before any evaluation: the original Elementum control tower is no longer sold on its own, since o9 Solutions folded it into its Digital Brain platform after the 2024 purchase. If your team wants that kind of real-time control tower, look at o9 Solutions directly, or at active competitors like Kinaxis Maestro, FourKites, or Blue Yonder's Command Center. If you were pointed to elementum.ai, note that the company at that address today builds general AI workflow tools, not supply chain software, so it is not the same product this listing describes. Before spending evaluation time here, confirm with o9 Solutions what became of Elementum's features and whether they are sold as an add-on or bundled into the core platform.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
68.3
Category rank
#11
Baseline ELO
1,459.8

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Supply Chain, Planning, and Logistics AI. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The tool has a middle-of-the-scale starting rating. A tied order does not show a measured difference.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production workspace.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$89.3K$139.9K$224.1K
Three-year total$195.6K$293.9K$452.1K
First-year cost per unit$89.3K$139.9K$224.1K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$65.2K$98K$150.7K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$31.5K$42K$56.7K
Implementation$14.4K$24K$40.8K
Integration$15.4K$28K$50.4K
Staff time and change management$9.1K$13K$18.2K
Security$7K$10K$15K
Administration$5.3K$7K$9.5K
Support$2.4K$3.2K$4.3K

Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production workspace. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Elementum and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Supply Chain, Planning, and Logistics AI
75TriVista score

Panasonic Connect (Blue Yonder)

Blue Yonder

An AI-driven supply chain platform, owned by Panasonic, that handles forecasting, warehouse, and transportation work in one system.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Blue Yonder
Supply Chain, Planning, and Logistics AI
75TriVista score

E2open

A supply chain network platform that connects shippers, suppliers, and carriers so partners can share data and coordinate in real time.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with E2open

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Kinaxis Maestro
Supply Chain, Planning, and Logistics AI
75TriVista score

Logility

A supply chain planning platform, now owned by Aptean, that uses generative AI in its DemandAI+ forecasting tool and goes live in weeks rather than months.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Logility
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information elementum.ai Read official information →
Official product information elementum.com Read official information →
Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 68.3/100
    Category rank #11

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →