Uptake
Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.
A platform that spots equipment problems in industrial sensor data automatically, without engineers writing detection rules by hand.
Falkonry is an industrial analytics platform, sold as Time Series AI, that watches streams of sensor data from equipment. The software finds patterns and flags anomalies without anyone writing detection rules by hand. Engineers connect their own data sources, like MQTT feeds, cloud storage, or databases, and the tool scores how unusual current behavior looks compared to normal history. Falkonry says it can spot warning signs three to ten weeks before equipment fails. It can run in the cloud, on-premises, at the edge, or in a fully disconnected, air-gapped setup, which makes it usable in defense and other high-security settings, not just factories.
This fits a team with a lot of sensor data and no easy way to search through it, such as an operations or reliability team already collecting time-series data from PLCs, historians, or SCADA systems. Start with one process or one piece of critical equipment, then expand once the model proves useful. Falkonry does not publish pricing online; ask for a trial and a quote, and treat any number you hear as a planning estimate. The tool is flexible about deployment and suits sites with strict data rules that need an on-premises or air-gapped setup. One limitation: the tool finds patterns and anomalies, but it does not replace domain expertise. Someone still needs to decide what an alert actually means and what action to take.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Three-year total | $226.3K | $339.9K | $522.5K |
| First-year cost per unit | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $75.5K | $113.3K | $174.2K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $37.5K | $50K | $67.5K |
| Implementation | $16.8K | $28K | $47.6K |
| Integration | $17.6K | $32K | $57.6K |
| Staff time and change management | $10.5K | $15K | $21K |
| Security | $7.7K | $11K | $16.5K |
| Administration | $5.6K | $7.5K | $10.1K |
| Support | $2.6K | $3.5K | $4.7K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Falkonry and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with UptakeA no-code computer vision tool that lets quality teams build models to spot visual defects without writing code or hiring data scientists.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Landing AIA predictive maintenance tool that forecasts equipment failures from sensor and maintenance data and adds a chat assistant for engineers.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with C3 AI ReliabilityRoyal HaskoningDHV (Lanner)
Simulation software for modeling factories and supply chains before making real changes, now sold by Haskoning under its Twinn brand rather than by Lanner.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Lanner WITNESSWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →