FloQast AI

AI tool profile ·

A month-end close platform with AI agents that match transactions and draft reconciliations, logging every action for audit review.

68TriVista score
Category rankTied #11 in Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI
Baseline ELO1,459.8
At a glance
What it does

FloQast is a close-management platform where accounting teams organize month-end close checklists, reconciliations, and journal entries in one place on top of an existing ERP. Its AI agents handle repetitive tasks, including transaction matching, reconciliation drafting, variance analysis, and evidence collection, and FloQast states every AI action is logged and a person must still sign off on each one. It was built by former accountants, is ISO 42001 certified for AI management and SOC 2 Type II compliant, and connects to ERPs including NetSuite, SAP, Oracle, Workday, Sage Intacct, Xero, and QuickBooks. Admins manage users, permissions, and integrations from a central settings area. FloQast reports more than 3,500 customer companies.

Where it can help

This fits an accounting team that has outgrown spreadsheet close checklists but does not yet need a full financial-close suite like BlackLine. A pilot with one accounting close cycle, tracked alongside the existing process, is a low-risk way to test fit before a full rollout. FloQast does not publish pricing; industry estimates put smaller deployments near $12,000 a year and typical annual contracts from $30,000 to $60,000, with larger ones higher, as planning figures only. Implementation usually takes two to three months and can cost several thousand dollars more depending on ERP complexity. Because pricing and terms are negotiated case by case, get multiple quotes and confirm what counts as a 'user' before signing.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
68.3
Category rank
#11
Baseline ELO
1,459.8

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The tool has a middle-of-the-scale starting rating. A tied order does not show a measured difference.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production workspace.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$72.1K$113.6K$183K
Three-year total$155.2K$234.4K$362.7K
First-year cost per unit$72.1K$113.6K$183K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$51.7K$78.1K$120.9K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$22.5K$30K$40.5K
Implementation$12K$20K$34K
Integration$13.2K$24K$43.2K
Staff time and change management$7.7K$11K$15.4K
Security$6.3K$9K$13.5K
Administration$4.9K$6.5K$8.8K
Support$2.1K$2.8K$3.8K

Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production workspace. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of FloQast AI and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI
77TriVista score

Vic.ai

An AI accounts payable tool that codes and routes invoices automatically, reaching high no-touch rates after a few months of learning your vendors.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Vic.ai
Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI
76TriVista score

Mosaic

A metrics-driven strategic finance platform for real-time forecasting whose current ownership and availability could not be confirmed during this research.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Mosaic
Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI
76TriVista score

Brex Empower

A budgeting and policy layer on the Brex corporate card and banking platform that enforces spending rules automatically as employees spend.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Brex Empower
Finance, Accounting, and FP&A AI
76TriVista score

HighRadius

A finance platform with more than 190 AI agents that speed up collections, match incoming cash to invoices, and automate close and treasury work.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with HighRadius
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information floqast.com Read official information →
Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 68.3/100
    Category rank #11

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →