Gloat

AI tool profile ·

An internal talent marketplace that uses AI to match a company's own employees to open roles, projects, mentors, and courses.

68TriVista score
Category rankTied #11 in Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI
Baseline ELO1,459.8
At a glance
What it does

Gloat is an internal talent marketplace. Employees log in and see open roles, short-term projects, mentorships, and courses matched to their own skills and stated career goals. Managers get visibility into their team's skills and can post project or stretch-role openings anyone in the company can apply for, and recruiters can search internal talent by skill when filling a role rather than looking only at external candidates. Gloat's AI weighs a strong skill match against growth potential and may rank a good long-term fit above a slightly closer skill match. It integrates with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Cloud HCM, and Microsoft Teams. It is made by Gloat, which reports customers see two to three times more internal moves after rollout.

Where it can help

This fits a company that already loses good people to outside offers because they cannot find their next role internally, and it works best once a company has already mapped roles to skills; if not, plan to do that work as part of the rollout. A pilot in one division focused on internal job matching alone is a reasonable way to test employee interest first. Gloat sells only annual enterprise contracts with custom, quote-based pricing, so treat any early figure as a rough planning number. The tool depends on good data: if skills profiles are thin or out of date, matches will be weak, so plan time to populate that data before launch. Change management matters as much as the software, since managers need a reason to post real openings on the marketplace rather than hire quietly around it.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
68.3
Category rank
#11
Baseline ELO
1,459.8

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The tool has a middle-of-the-scale starting rating. A tied order does not show a measured difference.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: enabled user.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$21K$34K$56.2K
Three-year total$39.1K$61.1K$97.9K
First-year cost per unit$1K$1.7K$2.8K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$651$1K$1.6K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$1.1K$1.5K$2K
Implementation$5.4K$9K$15.3K
Integration$3.9K$7K$12.6K
Staff time and change management$3.5K$5K$7K
Security$2.8K$4K$6K
Administration$2.3K$3K$4.1K
Support$1.1K$1.4K$1.9K

Estimate assumptions: Based on 20 enabled users. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Gloat and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI
90TriVista score

Greenhouse AI

AI features inside the Greenhouse hiring platform that take interview notes, review resumes, and audit for bias, with a person always making the hiring decision.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Greenhouse AI
Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI
89TriVista score

Rippling AI

The AI layer across a combined HR, IT, and payroll system that answers plain questions with charts, parses resumes, and flags payroll errors before they run.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Rippling AI
Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI
74TriVista score

HiBob AI

AI built into the HiBob core HR system that answers employee questions in plain language, predicts engagement risks, and automates HR tasks.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with HiBob AI
Human Resources, Recruiting, and Workforce AI
74TriVista score

iCIMS AI

AI features inside the iCIMS applicant tracking system that screen resumes, chat with candidates, and write job descriptions, built for high-volume hiring.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with iCIMS AI
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information gloat.com Read official information →
Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 68.3/100
    Category rank #11

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →