Legal, Contract, and Compliance AI
90TriVista score
Harvey
An AI tool built only for legal work that researches case law, reviews contracts, and analyzes large document sets for law firms and in-house teams.
LegalOn
AI tool profile ·
An AI contract review tool that redlines contracts against more than 135 lawyer-written playbooks, scaling from a solo attorney to a 40-person department.
74TriVista score
Category rank#4 in Legal, Contract, and Compliance AI
Baseline ELO1,496.0
Menu
At a glance
What it does
LegalOn is an AI contract review tool. Legal teams use it to triage incoming contract requests from email, Slack, or forms, then review and redline them against company standards using more than 135 attorney-built playbooks covering different contract types, industries, and countries. It sells three tiers, from Core Review for solo attorneys up to a full Productivity Suite that adds matter management and intake automation for larger teams, and works as an add-in inside Microsoft Word. It is made by LegalOn Technologies, holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 27007 certifications, and states it meets GDPR and CCPA rules.
Where it can help
This fits a legal team that reviews a high volume of routine contracts, like NDAs or vendor deals, scaling from a single in-house lawyer up to a legal department with 40 or more staff; the company reports more than 9,000 organizations use it. LegalOn does not publish exact prices but names three plans, Core Review for solo attorneys and the Contracting and Productivity Suites for larger teams, so ask a sales rep for a quote scoped to the right tier for your size. A sensible starting point is the Core Review tier for one or two attorneys, using its built-in playbooks on your highest-volume contract type first. The main thing to check is playbook fit, since a generic attorney-built playbook may not match your company's own risk tolerance right away, so plan real time to customize it before a full rollout.
Company fitHow your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Company fit
How your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score74.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,493.8
Change from baseline -2.9 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score74.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,494.0
Change from baseline -2.7 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score74.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,494.2
Change from baseline -2.5 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,499.1
Change from baseline +2.4 ELO
Technology Maturity High Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,494.4
Change from baseline -2.3 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,494.5
Change from baseline -2.2 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score74.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,494.7
Change from baseline -2.0 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score74.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,498.3
Change from baseline +1.6 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score74.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,498.0
Change from baseline +1.3 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score74.7 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,498.0
Change from baseline +1.3 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score74.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,495.8
Change from baseline -0.9 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score74.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,496.1
Change from baseline -0.6 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score74.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,496.2
Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score74.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Manufacturing
Adjusted ELO 1,497.1
Change from baseline +0.4 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score74.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,497.0
Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score74.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,496.6
Change from baseline -0.1 ELO
Cost guide
What it can cost
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $64.3K | $101.5K | $164K |
| Three-year total | $137.2K | $207.8K | $322.5K |
| First-year cost per unit | $64.3K | $101.5K | $164K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $45.7K | $69.3K | $107.5K |
Cost breakdown by scenario
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $18.8K | $25K | $33.8K |
| Implementation | $10.8K | $18K | $30.6K |
| Integration | $12.1K | $22K | $39.6K |
| Staff time and change management | $7K | $10K | $14K |
| Security | $6K | $8.5K | $12.8K |
| Administration | $4.5K | $6K | $8.1K |
| Support | $2.1K | $2.8K | $3.8K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production workspace. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Get started
What you need first
What you need firstSet up the basics
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
How to startSet clear limits
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Before you scaleSet safe working rules
Recommended next action
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner
Define what success looks like for a test of LegalOn and assign someone to lead it.
FIRST MONTHTest one workflow
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
MONTH TWOReview actual use
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
MONTH THREEDecide what comes next
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Risk profile
Required controls
Security and safe use
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Exit and rollback
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Recommended next step
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Other tools to review
Compare similar tools
Legal, Contract, and Compliance AI
89TriVista score
LexisNexis
Lexis+ with Protégé (formerly Lexis+ AI)
An AI legal research tool that answers legal questions with cited case law and drafts documents, from LexisNexis, now called Lexis+ with Protege.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Lexis+ with Protégé (formerly Lexis+ AI)Legal, Contract, and Compliance AI
75TriVista score
Thomson Reuters
CoCounsel
An AI assistant for lawyers, tax staff, and auditors that answers questions backed by Westlaw case law and drafts memos and briefs, from Thomson Reuters.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with CoCounselLegal, Contract, and Compliance AI
74TriVista score
Litera AI
AI features spread across Litera's legal software for drafting documents, comparing versions, and running deal checks inside Word and Outlook.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Litera AIResearch support
How to learn more about this tool
Where to check the product, price, security, and support.
Official product information
legalontech.com
Read official information →
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Score history
How the rating has changed
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
-
TriVista Score 74.3/100Category rank #4
-
TriVista Score 74.3/100Category rank #4
See how this tool fits your company
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →