Make

AI tool profile ·

A visual, drag-and-drop automation tool that links more than 2,000 apps, usually priced lower than its main rivals.

75TriVista score
Category rank#9 in Workflow Automation and RPA
Baseline ELO1,499.1
At a glance
What it does

Make is a no-code automation tool where a team builds workflows, called scenarios, by dragging modules onto a visual canvas and connecting them. A scenario moves data between apps with no code, and the visual canvas makes complex, branching logic easier to see than in list-based tools. It connects to over 2,000 apps, and users can also call any REST API directly. It is made by Celonis, known for process mining software, which acquired Make (formerly Integromat) in 2020. Paid plans add single sign-on through OAuth2 or SAML2, and admins get audit logs, two-factor authentication, and custom user roles.

Where it can help

This fits a team that uses many SaaS apps and wants to connect them without hiring developers for every request. A good starting point is one team, like marketing or ops, piloting on the free or Core plan. Paid plans start around $10 a month for a set number of run credits; larger teams need the Teams or Enterprise plan for single sign-on, audit logs, and role controls. Treat any price here as a planning estimate. Watch two risks: complex scenarios can get hard to maintain as more people build them, so set naming and ownership rules early, and credit-based pricing means a busy workflow can use up a plan's limit fast, so track usage before rolling out company-wide.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
74.9
Category rank
#9
Baseline ELO
1,499.1

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Workflow Automation and RPA. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The starting rating includes a product-specific comparison.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Company fit

How your company could affect the fit

How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.

Technology Maturity High Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,498.9 Change from baseline -1.8 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,498.9 Change from baseline -1.7 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,499.0 Change from baseline -1.7 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,499.0 Change from baseline -1.7 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,499.1 Change from baseline -1.6 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score74.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,499.3 Change from baseline -1.4 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score74.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,499.3 Change from baseline -1.4 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline Manufacturing Adjusted ELO 1,501.5 Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,501.4 Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score75.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,500.2 Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score75.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,500.2 Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,500.4 Change from baseline -0.3 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,500.5 Change from baseline -0.2 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,500.8 Change from baseline +0.2 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#10
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,500.6 Change from baseline -0.1 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score75.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#9
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,500.8 Change from baseline +0.1 ELO
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production deployment.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$49.3K$78.3K$127.1K
Three-year total$103.5K$157.5K$245.6K
First-year cost per unit$49.3K$78.3K$127.1K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$34.5K$52.5K$81.9K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$13.5K$18K$24.3K
Implementation$8.4K$14K$23.8K
Integration$9.9K$18K$32.4K
Staff time and change management$5.6K$8K$11.2K
Security$4.6K$6.5K$9.8K
Administration$3.4K$4.5K$6.1K
Support$1.7K$2.2K$3K

Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Make and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Workflow Automation and RPA
87TriVista score

Tines

A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Tines
Workflow Automation and RPA
86TriVista score

Gumloop

A no-code tool where a team builds AI agents together on a shared canvas, connecting them to apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Gmail.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Gumloop
Workflow Automation and RPA
76TriVista score

Bardeen

A browser extension that pulls data from websites and finds sales leads, rather than automating back-office processes.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Bardeen

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with AutomationEdge
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information make.com/en Read official information →

Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.

Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 74.9/100
    Category rank #9
  • Research release
    TriVista Score 74.9/100
    Category rank #10

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →