Tines
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
A low-code automation tool for cloud workflows and desktop robots, built into Microsoft 365 and using the same sign-in.
Power Automate is a low-code automation tool inside Microsoft's Power Platform. Business users build cloud flows between Microsoft 365 apps like Outlook, SharePoint, and Teams, and it also runs desktop automation, known as RPA, for tasks in older apps with no API. Bots can run attended, with a person present, or unattended on their own. It uses the same Microsoft Entra ID sign-in as the rest of Microsoft 365, so staff need no separate login. Admins manage flows and bots through the Power Platform admin center, setting data loss prevention policies and connector permissions there. It includes AI Builder, which adds prebuilt AI models for tasks like reading forms.
This fits a company already paying for Microsoft 365, since many cloud flows work with a standard license and staff can start free. A good pilot is one department automating approvals or file routing. Add the Premium plan, near $15 per user a month, once you need premium connectors; it also covers desktop bots run by a person. Unattended bots that run on a schedule cost closer to $150 per bot per month, and a Microsoft-hosted machine near $215 a bot; treat these as planning numbers and get a real quote from Microsoft or a partner. Two risks stand out: governance can slip if any employee can build flows that touch sensitive data, so set data loss prevention rules early, and costs can climb fast once a team adds many unattended bots.
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Three-year total | $103.5K | $157.5K | $245.6K |
| First-year cost per unit | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $34.5K | $52.5K | $81.9K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $13.5K | $18K | $24.3K |
| Implementation | $8.4K | $14K | $23.8K |
| Integration | $9.9K | $18K | $32.4K |
| Staff time and change management | $5.6K | $8K | $11.2K |
| Security | $4.6K | $6.5K | $9.8K |
| Administration | $3.4K | $4.5K | $6.1K |
| Support | $1.7K | $2.2K | $3K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Microsoft Power Automate and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with TinesA no-code tool where a team builds AI agents together on a shared canvas, connecting them to apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Gmail.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with GumloopA browser extension that pulls data from websites and finds sales leads, rather than automating back-office processes.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with BardeenA robot and IT automation tool with ready-made agents for IT, HR, and finance help-desk requests, with a free tier to start.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with AutomationEdgeWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →