An IT alert-correlation tool, now owned by Dell, that uses machine learning to cut alert noise and group related alerts into one problem.
Moogsoft AIOps is an alert correlation and noise reduction tool for IT operations teams; Dell Technologies bought the company in 2023 and now sells it as part of its IT operations software. Moogsoft takes in alerts from many monitoring sources and uses machine learning to group related alerts into a single situation, so engineers see one clear problem instead of a flood of alerts. The tool assigns a likely cause and severity score to each situation and can trigger a runbook on its own. Before the acquisition, Moogsoft served over 140 customers, including large firms like American Airlines and Fannie Mae. It integrates with common ticketing, chat, and monitoring tools, and setup is self-service and cloud-native.
This fits a company running Dell IT operations tools, or one already checking out AIOps for alert noise, especially a DevOps or infrastructure team paged too often for related, low-value alerts. A reasonable pilot is feeding alerts from your top two or three noisiest tools into Moogsoft and measuring the drop in pages per week. Because Dell folded Moogsoft into its broader portfolio, public list pricing is not available; treat any quote as tied to your existing or planned Dell relationship and confirm current packaging directly with Dell. One risk with any newly acquired product is a shift in roadmap or support, so ask Dell directly how Moogsoft fits its long-term AIOps plans before you commit budget.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $80.5K | $126.5K | $203.2K |
| Three-year total | $174.8K | $263.3K | $406.3K |
| First-year cost per unit | $80.5K | $126.5K | $203.2K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $58.3K | $87.8K | $135.4K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $27K | $36K | $48.6K |
| Implementation | $13.2K | $22K | $37.4K |
| Integration | $14.3K | $26K | $46.8K |
| Staff time and change management | $8.4K | $12K | $16.8K |
| Security | $6.7K | $9.5K | $14.3K |
| Administration | $4.9K | $6.5K | $8.8K |
| Support | $2.3K | $3K | $4.1K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Moogsoft AIOps and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
The AI inside ScienceLogic's IT monitoring platform, now branded Skylar AI, that links events across a company's IT map and drafts root-cause explanations.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with ScienceLogic Skylar AI (formerly SL1 AI)A built-in AI assistant for Atera's remote IT monitoring tool that diagnoses devices, writes scripts, and drafts ticket replies, now free in every plan.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Atera AILogicMonitor's infrastructure monitoring platform, whose Edwin AI engine links alerts and points to a likely root cause.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with LogicMonitor LM EnvisionA unified IT device management tool whose AI features flag risky Windows updates before they roll out to the whole fleet.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with NinjaOne AIWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →
