Tines
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
A workflow automation tool that developers can self-host for free and extend with their own code inside any step.
n8n is a workflow automation tool that connects apps and moves data with little or no code, but unlike many rivals it lets a developer write custom code inside a workflow step for more control. It ships under a fair-code license called the Sustainable Use License, so you can self-host it for free with no limit on workflows or steps, or use its managed cloud version on paid plans. It includes nodes built for AI tasks, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which grounds an AI model's answers in your own documents. The company behind it, also called n8n, is based in Germany. Enterprise features include single sign-on, SAML, LDAP login, and audit logs.
This fits a team with at least one developer who wants full control over workflows, for internal tools, AI agents, and custom integrations that no-code tools cannot handle. Free self-hosting on a small server is a good starting point for a one-team pilot, with the catch that you manage updates, backups, and security yourself. The managed n8n Cloud starts near $20 to $24 a month, and larger teams needing single sign-on and audit logs should plan for a higher tier priced by request; treat all figures as planning estimates. The main risk is the learning curve: simple workflows are easy, but workflows with error handling and custom code take real time to learn, so budget training before a wider rollout.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Three-year total | $103.5K | $157.5K | $245.6K |
| First-year cost per unit | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $34.5K | $52.5K | $81.9K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $13.5K | $18K | $24.3K |
| Implementation | $8.4K | $14K | $23.8K |
| Integration | $9.9K | $18K | $32.4K |
| Staff time and change management | $5.6K | $8K | $11.2K |
| Security | $4.6K | $6.5K | $9.8K |
| Administration | $3.4K | $4.5K | $6.1K |
| Support | $1.7K | $2.2K | $3K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of n8n and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
A no-code tool where a team builds AI agents together on a shared canvas, connecting them to apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Gmail.
An AI-first workflow automation tool that shut down permanently in 2026 and should not be shortlisted.
A browser extension that pulls data from websites and finds sales leads, rather than automating back-office processes.
Where to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →