Tines
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
An automation layer built into ServiceNow that adds software robots, process mining, and AI agents to its workflow platform.
Automation Engine is the automation layer inside ServiceNow's main workflow platform, used for steps other ServiceNow workflows cannot reach. Its RPA Hub connects to apps that have no API through software robots, which can be attended, running on a user's desktop with their help, or unattended, running on their own on a server. Admins configure bots, credentials, and queues from RPA Hub. It also includes process mining, which studies system logs to find slow or repeated steps. Forrester named ServiceNow a leader in its 2024 Wave report on task-centric automation software. Because it sits inside the platform, a company generally needs an existing ServiceNow instance to use it.
This fits a company that already runs ServiceNow for IT or service work; it makes less sense as a first automation tool on its own. A good starting point is one process with a clear paper trail, such as IT ticket handling or employee onboarding. ServiceNow does not publish set prices for Automation Engine or its bots, so expect a custom quote and ask about cost per bot and any extra process mining fees, which often sit outside the base license. The main risk is scope: it works best when it reads from and writes back to ServiceNow, so pick early projects that touch data already in the platform. A second risk is cost creep from add-ons for AI agents and process mining, so confirm total cost before committing.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Three-year total | $103.5K | $157.5K | $245.6K |
| First-year cost per unit | $49.3K | $78.3K | $127.1K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $34.5K | $52.5K | $81.9K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $13.5K | $18K | $24.3K |
| Implementation | $8.4K | $14K | $23.8K |
| Integration | $9.9K | $18K | $32.4K |
| Staff time and change management | $5.6K | $8K | $11.2K |
| Security | $4.6K | $6.5K | $9.8K |
| Administration | $3.4K | $4.5K | $6.1K |
| Support | $1.7K | $2.2K | $3K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of ServiceNow Automation Engine and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
A no-code workflow automation tool built for security and IT teams, which lets a company pick its own AI model.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with TinesA no-code tool where a team builds AI agents together on a shared canvas, connecting them to apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Gmail.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with GumloopA browser extension that pulls data from websites and finds sales leads, rather than automating back-office processes.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with BardeenA robot and IT automation tool with ready-made agents for IT, HR, and finance help-desk requests, with a free tier to start.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with AutomationEdgeWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →