Vic.ai
An AI accounts payable tool that codes and routes invoices automatically, reaching high no-touch rates after a few months of learning your vendors.
A forecasting add-on for the Anaplan planning platform that uses machine learning and shows the assumptions behind each prediction.
Anaplan PlanIQ is a forecasting add-on inside Anaplan, a connected planning platform used by FP&A, sales, and supply chain teams. Planners select a historical data set inside their existing Anaplan model, and PlanIQ applies machine-learning algorithms, including Prophet and DeepAR+-style time-series models alongside Anaplan's own statistical methods, to generate a forecast. A wizard-style interface shows which assumptions and drivers went into each forecast, so planners can see why a number came out the way it did rather than trusting an unexplained output. Anaplan supports single sign-on through SAML 2.0, role-based access control, and customer-managed encryption keys, and PlanIQ forecasts run inside the same governed model as the rest of a company's planning.
This fits a company already using Anaplan for budgeting or supply planning that wants statistical forecasting without exporting data to a separate tool. A reasonable starting point is applying PlanIQ to one forecast, such as demand or revenue for a single business line, and comparing its output against the team's existing method for a full cycle before rolling it out further. Anaplan does not publish pricing for PlanIQ or its core platform, so any figure you see elsewhere is a planning estimate; request a quote through your Anaplan account team. Two main risks: PlanIQ only adds value once your Anaplan model already has clean historical data to learn from, and Anaplan licensing is negotiated per contract, so costs vary widely between companies.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $72.1K | $113.6K | $183K |
| Three-year total | $155.2K | $234.4K | $362.7K |
| First-year cost per unit | $72.1K | $113.6K | $183K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $51.7K | $78.1K | $120.9K |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $22.5K | $30K | $40.5K |
| Implementation | $12K | $20K | $34K |
| Integration | $13.2K | $24K | $43.2K |
| Staff time and change management | $7.7K | $11K | $15.4K |
| Security | $6.3K | $9K | $13.5K |
| Administration | $4.9K | $6.5K | $8.8K |
| Support | $2.1K | $2.8K | $3.8K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production workspace. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Anaplan PlanIQ and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
An AI accounts payable tool that codes and routes invoices automatically, reaching high no-touch rates after a few months of learning your vendors.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Vic.aiA metrics-driven strategic finance platform for real-time forecasting whose current ownership and availability could not be confirmed during this research.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with MosaicA budgeting and policy layer on the Brex corporate card and banking platform that enforces spending rules automatically as employees spend.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Brex EmpowerA finance platform with more than 190 AI agents that speed up collections, match incoming cash to invoices, and automate close and treasury work.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with HighRadiusWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →