Avoma

AI tool profile ·

An AI meeting assistant for sales teams that records calls, writes notes, and updates the CRM, with paid add-ons for call scoring.

84TriVista score
Category rank#3 in Meeting and Conversation Intelligence
Baseline ELO1,556.7
At a glance
What it does

Avoma is an AI meeting assistant built for revenue teams. It records calls across Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, and GoToMeeting, transcribes them in more than 70 languages, and writes meeting notes with topic labels and speaker identification. It syncs notes and call data into a CRM automatically, cutting manual data entry, and includes a scheduling tool for sales calls. Two deeper modules, Conversation Intelligence and Revenue Intelligence, add call scoring and pipeline insight but cost extra and are not in the base plan. Higher tiers include single sign-on with SAML or OIDC, a signed data processing agreement, and HIPAA compliance for regulated industries.

Where it can help

This fits a revenue team that wants meeting notes, call scoring, and CRM updates in one system. A reasonable pilot is the Organization plan, around $29 per seat per month on an annual contract, which supports up to 100 paid seats. Add Conversation Intelligence or Revenue Intelligence, each roughly $29 per seat per month, only once the base rollout works well. Treat these as planning figures and confirm with Avoma. Viewer and collaborator seats are free, so light users need no paid license. The main risk is cost, since add-on modules stack up quickly across a sales floor. Also budget time to build the custom smart-topic templates that fit your sales process.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
84.5
Category rank
#3
Baseline ELO
1,556.7

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Meeting and Conversation Intelligence. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The starting rating includes a product-specific comparison.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Company fit

How your company could affect the fit

How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.

Technology Maturity High Modeled score85.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,562.1 Change from baseline +15.5 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score85.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,560.4 Change from baseline +13.9 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score85.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,559.8 Change from baseline +13.2 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score84.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,559.5 Change from baseline +12.9 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score84.6 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,557.4 Change from baseline +10.8 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score84.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,557.3 Change from baseline +10.7 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score82.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,543.1 Change from baseline -3.5 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score83.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,549.0 Change from baseline +2.4 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score83.1 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,548.8 Change from baseline +2.3 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score83.0 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,548.2 Change from baseline +1.7 ELO
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score82.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Moderate Adjusted ELO 1,544.9 Change from baseline -1.7 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score82.5 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Manufacturing Adjusted ELO 1,545.0 Change from baseline -1.5 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score82.9 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,547.4 Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score82.6 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,545.9 Change from baseline -0.7 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score82.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products Adjusted ELO 1,546.8 Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score82.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline $25M-$100M Adjusted ELO 1,546.6 Change from baseline +0.1 ELO
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: enabled user.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$10.6K$16.9K$27.7K
Three-year total$20.5K$31.6K$50.2K
First-year cost per unit$529$847$1.4K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$341$527$836
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$525$700$945
Implementation$2.4K$4K$6.8K
Integration$1.8K$3.2K$5.8K
Staff time and change management$1.8K$2.6K$3.6K
Security$1.5K$2.2K$3.3K
Administration$1.4K$1.8K$2.4K
Support$675$900$1.2K

Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 20 enabled users. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Avoma and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Meeting and Conversation Intelligence
85TriVista score

Otter.ai

An AI notetaker that turns meetings into live, searchable transcripts and summaries, with a generous free plan for solo use.

Meeting and Conversation Intelligence
84TriVista score

Fathom

An AI notetaker that records sales calls and writes the notes straight into CRM fields, with a free plan to start.

Meeting and Conversation Intelligence
84TriVista score

Read AI

An AI meeting notetaker that also coaches how you speak, tracking filler words, pace, and listener sentiment.

Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Reference source Product website View source →
Reference source Public directory listing View source →

Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Good support.

Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 84.5/100
    Category rank #3
  • Research release
    TriVista Score 84.5/100
    Category rank #3

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →