Drishti

AI tool profile ·

A camera-based analytics tool for tracking manual assembly line work, though its main website did not load during this research.

66TriVista score
Category rank#20 in Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
Baseline ELO1,447.2
At a glance
What it does

Drishti was a manufacturing analytics tool founded in 2017 that used cameras and computer vision to watch manual assembly line work, the kind other sensors cannot easily measure. The system timed each worker action and compared it to the standard process, helping engineers find bottlenecks and training gaps on lines still done by hand. Drishti had worked with major manufacturers, including DENSO and Flex, and said it worked with several of the largest global car makers. The World Economic Forum once named Drishti a Technology Pioneer. As of this research, the company's main website, drishti.com, did not load at all, which is a strong sign the product may no longer be actively offered. Confirm current status directly before including Drishti in any shortlist.

Where it can help

This originally fit a factory with a lot of manual assembly work that is hard to measure with normal sensors, like small parts assembly or electronics, with an industrial engineering or continuous improvement team as the natural owner of a pilot. This research found that the company's main website does not currently load, which raises real doubt about whether the product is still actively sold and supported, so treat this listing as unverified. Before spending real time on it, confirm the company still exists and ask for a live product demo and recent customer references. If Drishti is still operating under a different name or site, one thing stays the same: camera-based monitoring of workers needs clear, upfront communication with staff about what is tracked and why.

Understanding this score

A research signal to help you build a shortlist.

TriVista score
66.2
Category rank
#20
Baseline ELO
1,447.2

Compare within the category

This tool is ranked in Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI. Its score is not a global ranking across every AI tool.

Use a pilot to judge your fit

The score does not guarantee performance for your team. Validate relevance, integration, permissions, and cost against your own requirements.

How the number is calculated

The score converts the baseline ELO rating onto the TriVista scale. The headline badge rounds to a whole number. Scores are not silently clipped or capped.

TriVista Score = 50 + (ELO − 1350) / 6

Before you choose
  • Customer feedback is not yet strong enough to change the starting rating.
  • The tool has a middle-of-the-scale starting rating. A tied order does not show a measured difference.
  • Check the current price before you decide.
  • We recorded rollout time, how it runs, and when it does not fit.
How company details affect the score

The model adjusts the starting rating using the company details you select. Use these estimates to prioritize your review, then test the tool against your own requirements.

Read the full methodology →
Cost guide

What it can cost

These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.

Cost estimates by scenario Unit used in these estimates: production deployment.
Cost measureLowBaseHigh
First-year total$103.3K$161.7K$258.8K
Three-year total$226.3K$339.9K$522.5K
First-year cost per unit$103.3K$161.7K$258.8K
Average annual cost per unit (over three years)$75.5K$113.3K$174.2K
Cost breakdown by scenario
Included cost components
ComponentLowBaseHigh
Licensing and usage$37.5K$50K$67.5K
Implementation$16.8K$28K$47.6K
Integration$17.6K$32K$57.6K
Staff time and change management$10.5K$15K$21K
Security$7.7K$11K$16.5K
Administration$5.6K$7.5K$10.1K
Support$2.6K$3.5K$4.7K

Estimate assumptions: Based on 1 production deployment. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.

Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.

Get started

What you need first

What you need firstSet up the basics

Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.

How to startSet clear limits

Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot

Before you scaleSet safe working rules

Review security and exit requirements →

Recommended next action

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner

Define what success looks like for a test of Drishti and assign someone to lead it.

FIRST MONTHTest one workflow

Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.

MONTH TWOReview actual use

Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.

MONTH THREEDecide what comes next

Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.

Risk profile

Required controls

Security and safe use

Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.

Exit and rollback

Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.

Recommended next step

Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.

Other tools to review

Compare similar tools

Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
87TriVista score

Uptake

Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Uptake
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
86TriVista score

Landing AI

A no-code computer vision tool that lets quality teams build models to spot visual defects without writing code or hiring data scientists.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Landing AI
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score

C3 AI Reliability

A predictive maintenance tool that forecasts equipment failures from sensor and maintenance data and adds a chat assistant for engineers.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with C3 AI Reliability
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score

Royal HaskoningDHV (Lanner)

Lanner WITNESS

Simulation software for modeling factories and supply chains before making real changes, now sold by Haskoning under its Twinn brand rather than by Lanner.

Why it’s an alternative—

Compare with Lanner WITNESS
Research support

How to learn more about this tool

Where to check the product, price, security, and support.

Official product information sri.com/press/blog-archive/launching-drishti-continuing-sri… Read official information →
Score history

How the rating has changed

Recorded score and category rank across research updates.

  • Current catalog refresh
    TriVista Score 66.2/100
    Category rank #20

See how this tool fits your company

Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.

Check the fit →

Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →