Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
87TriVista score
Uptake
Predictive maintenance software for truck and equipment fleets that flags problems before a breakdown, with Bosch now acquiring the company.
Protex AI
AI tool profile ·
A workplace safety tool that reads existing security cameras with computer vision to catch risks like missing PPE or unsafe forklift driving.
75TriVista score
Category rank#5 in Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
Baseline ELO1,501.1
Menu
At a glance
What it does
Protex AI is a workplace safety tool, founded in 2021 and based in Dublin and Boston. Its software connects to cameras a warehouse or factory already has, which usually means no need for new hardware. Computer vision then watches for safety issues such as missing PPE, unsafe forklift moves, or people entering a restricted area. When it spots a problem, an alert called Protex Signal reaches safety staff within one or two seconds. All video processing happens on-site, and footage is anonymized before any data leaves the building. The tool connects to safety systems like Alcumus and SafetyCulture, and to CMMS and warehouse management systems. It holds ISO/IEC 27001 certification and is built to meet GDPR rules.
Where it can help
This fits a company running warehouses or factories that already have security cameras installed, and a safety or environmental health team looking for earlier warning of at-risk behavior. A common rollout pattern is starting with a handful of sites, then expanding site by site once it proves useful. Pricing is not public and there is no free trial, so expect a sales process and treat any figure as a planning estimate. The vendor lists large customers like Amazon and DHL and cites big drops in risky events, but those numbers come from vendor case studies, not independent audits. The tool watches workers on camera, so plan for clear communication with staff about what it tracks and how footage is used, to build trust before rollout.
Company fitHow your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Company fit
How your company could affect the fit
How one company factor at a time moves the modeled score. The published score is unchanged.
Technology Maturity Low Modeled score74.8 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,498.7
Change from baseline -3.0 ELO
Industry Construction and real estate Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#3
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.5
Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Revenue Band $500M-$2B Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,502.5
Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Industry Retail and distribution Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.5
Change from baseline +0.8 ELO
Industry Energy and utilities Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.3
Change from baseline +0.6 ELO
Company Type Business services Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#4
Baseline Manufacturing
Adjusted ELO 1,502.3
Change from baseline +0.6 ELO
Revenue Band $100M-$500M Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,501.1
Change from baseline -0.6 ELO
Revenue Band Under $25M Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,501.2
Change from baseline -0.5 ELO
Revenue Band Over $2B Modeled score75.4 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline $25M-$100M
Adjusted ELO 1,502.1
Change from baseline +0.4 ELO
Technology Maturity High Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Moderate
Adjusted ELO 1,501.3
Change from baseline -0.4 ELO
Industry Technology and telecommunications Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.1
Change from baseline +0.4 ELO
Industry Automotive and transportation Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.3
Change from baseline -0.4 ELO
Industry Food and beverage Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#6
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,502.0
Change from baseline +0.3 ELO
Industry Financial and professional services Modeled score75.2 / 100 Modeled category rank#5
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.4
Change from baseline -0.3 ELO
Industry Industrial manufacturing Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#7
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.9
Change from baseline +0.2 ELO
Industry Healthcare and life sciences Modeled score75.3 / 100 Modeled category rank#8
Baseline Consumer products
Adjusted ELO 1,501.6
Change from baseline -0.1 ELO
Cost guide
What it can cost
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Three-year total | $226.3K | $339.9K | $522.5K |
| First-year cost per unit | $103.3K | $161.7K | $258.8K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $75.5K | $113.3K | $174.2K |
Cost breakdown by scenario
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $37.5K | $50K | $67.5K |
| Implementation | $16.8K | $28K | $47.6K |
| Integration | $17.6K | $32K | $57.6K |
| Staff time and change management | $10.5K | $15K | $21K |
| Security | $7.7K | $11K | $16.5K |
| Administration | $5.6K | $7.5K | $10.1K |
| Support | $2.6K | $3.5K | $4.7K |
Estimate assumptions: This scenario uses a category-based allowance, not a verified price for this product. Based on 1 production deployment. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Get started
What you need first
What you need firstSet up the basics
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
How to startSet clear limits
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Before you scaleSet safe working rules
Recommended next action
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Decision ownerBusiness and technology owner
STARTSet a goal and owner
Define what success looks like for a test of Protex AI and assign someone to lead it.
FIRST MONTHTest one workflow
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
MONTH TWOReview actual use
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
MONTH THREEDecide what comes next
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Risk profile
Required controls
Security and safe use
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Exit and rollback
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Recommended next step
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Other tools to review
Compare similar tools
Manufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
86TriVista score
Landing AI
A no-code computer vision tool that lets quality teams build models to spot visual defects without writing code or hiring data scientists.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Landing AIManufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score
C3 AI Reliability
A predictive maintenance tool that forecasts equipment failures from sensor and maintenance data and adds a chat assistant for engineers.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with C3 AI ReliabilityManufacturing, Industrial, Maintenance, and Quality AI
75TriVista score
Royal HaskoningDHV (Lanner)
Lanner WITNESS
Simulation software for modeling factories and supply chains before making real changes, now sold by Haskoning under its Twinn brand rather than by Lanner.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Lanner WITNESSResearch support
How to learn more about this tool
Where to check the product, price, security, and support.
Official product information
protex.ai
Read official information →
Research observations recorded: 1. Evidence quality: Some support.
Score history
How the rating has changed
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
-
TriVista Score 75.2/100Category rank #5
-
TriVista Score 75.2/100Category rank #5
See how this tool fits your company
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →