Fireflies.ai
An AI notetaker that joins meetings on more than a dozen apps, writes summaries, and sends notes to your CRM.
A sales call analysis tool from France that scores calls and updates the CRM automatically, strong with European CRMs.
Modjo is a sales call analysis tool for revenue teams. It records and analyzes sales calls, scores them, and writes call summaries automatically, so reps skip manual CRM data entry. Managers use it for call review and coaching notes. It is made by the French company Modjo, which describes itself as a leader in the European market with more than 600 revenue teams as users. A newer AI Sales Agent feature and an MCP connection extend it into broader workflow automation. It connects to Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Pipedrive, and several other CRMs. Admin details sit in Modjo's Trust Center, which includes a data processing agreement and subprocessor list.
This fits a sales company, especially one with European customers or CRMs like Pipedrive or Sellsy that some US-first competitors support less well. Modjo says it works best starting at three sales reps, so a single sales pod can start without a full company rollout. Modjo does not publish per-seat pricing, so request a written quote and treat any verbal number as a planning estimate. Its Trust Center lists a data processing agreement and subprocessor disclosures but does not publicly list SOC 2 or ISO certifications the way some US competitors do, so ask directly if that matters. Most of its public case studies are European, so ask for references from a company similar to yours before committing.
These estimates cover licensing, setup, integrations, staff time, security, administration, and support.
| Cost measure | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year total | $10.6K | $16.9K | $27.7K |
| Three-year total | $20.5K | $31.6K | $50.2K |
| First-year cost per unit | $529 | $847 | $1.4K |
| Average annual cost per unit (over three years) | $341 | $527 | $836 |
| Component | Low | Base | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing and usage | $525 | $700 | $945 |
| Implementation | $2.4K | $4K | $6.8K |
| Integration | $1.8K | $3.2K | $5.8K |
| Staff time and change management | $1.8K | $2.6K | $3.6K |
| Security | $1.5K | $2.2K | $3.3K |
| Administration | $1.4K | $1.8K | $2.4K |
| Support | $675 | $900 | $1.2K |
Estimate assumptions: Based on 20 enabled users. This is a planning allowance, not verified product pricing. Confirm the vendor’s billing unit and current price or quote before budgeting.
Benefits have not been estimated: The current research does not estimate potential savings, return on investment, or how long it would take to recover the cost. Earlier benefit estimates are excluded.
Confirm current product identity, commercial packaging, data processing terms, sign-in and access rules, retention, integrations, support model, implementation effort, and rollback conditions.
Verify identity, package, availability, ownership, pricing, and security evidence before approving a pilot
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
Define what success looks like for a test of Modjo and assign someone to lead it.
Once the requirements above are met, compare a small trial with how your team works today.
Track adoption, output quality, business results, and actual costs against the estimate.
Use the results to decide whether to stop, adjust, or expand the pilot.
Confirm encryption, how the vendor uses your data, customer data separation, how long data stays and how to delete it, activity records, sign-in and user setup, where data is handled, other companies that process data, past incidents, and what your team must manage.
Review before rollout: confirm how to export your data, revoke access, and return to your existing workflow. Assign an owner and test the rollback plan before expanding use.
Do not approve a pilot yet. Verify the current product identity, package, availability, owner, pricing, and security evidence; then define one workflow, a baseline, and rollback criteria.
An AI notetaker that joins meetings on more than a dozen apps, writes summaries, and sends notes to your CRM.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Fireflies.aiAn AI notetaker that turns meetings into live, searchable transcripts and summaries, with a generous free plan for solo use.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with Otter.aiAn AI meeting assistant for sales teams that records calls, writes notes, and updates the CRM, with paid add-ons for call scoring.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with AvomaAn AI notetaker that records sales calls and writes the notes straight into CRM fields, with a free plan to start.
Why it’s an alternative—
Compare with FathomWhere to check the product, price, security, and support.
Recorded score and category rank across research updates.
Answer a few questions about your company and compare this tool with others. The research score above stays the same.
Want help moving from research to action? Explore TriVista’s AI consulting services →